Top California Poker Site 2019: Global Poker

  • california poker site
    Available in most US States including California!

    Play Now at Global Poker

    Global Poker allows players in California to play online poker and win real money! You can deposit via credit or debit card and play for real cash prizes!

    Claim your 5,000 gold chips at Global Poker!

  • Vayo Drops PokerStars Suit Amid Forged Document Allegations

    gordon vayo world series of poker
    By Marty Derbyshire

    November 28, 2018

    California-based Gordon Vayo is now dropping his $700,000 lawsuit against PokerStars after the site alleged he was using forged documents to prove his case.

    Jason Somerville’s Run It Up Series Headed To California

    By Marty Derbyshire

    November 24, 2018

    The Run It Up poker brand and founder Jason Somerville are coming to California for a five-day festival at Stones Gambling Hall beginning Dec. 5.

    Torrance Pro Wins $149,733 In Bicycle Hotel & Casino’s Big Poker Oktober

    By Marty Derbyshire

    November 3, 2018

    Torrance’s Steve Jun beat a field of 524 entries to win the 2018 Card Player Poker Tour Bicycle Hotel & Casino $500,000 guaranteed $1,100 main event.

    Featured California Online Poker Stories

  • image description
    By Steve Ruddock

    AB 1677 Online Poker Bill

    Introduced by Reggie Jones-Sawyer, AB 1677 is the first bill introduced in the 2017 legislative year to legalize online poker in California.

  • is your source for news and information on California legislation that would legalize online poker for California residents.

    California online poker: Background


    As expected, 2018 was not the year for California online poker. For the first time in a decade, no poker-related proposals were put forward during the legislative session. The national gambling debate shifted to sports betting after SCOTUS overturned the federal PASPA ban in May.

    Unfortunately, California needs to amend its constitution before its lawmakers can start working on a bookmaking bill. Assemblyman Adam Gray proposed putting this issue on the November 2018 ballot, but his initiative didn’t gain enough support before the elections.

    As a result, Californians won’t get to vote on sports betting legalization until November 2020. If the online poker camp decides to stick to Jones-Sawyer’s plan and pair its new bill with this issue, 2019 will be another year in which we won’t see any meaningful legislative action.

    On the judicial front, the Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel tribe lost the Desert Rose Bingo case in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The online bingo operation that was supposed to pave the way for tribal internet poker was deemed illegal. The court dismissed the argument that all servers were located on tribal land and based its decision on the fact that the act of betting occurred elsewhere.

    California online gambling fact sheet:

    Land-based casinos:Tribal
    Land-based card rooms:Poker and other card games
    Sports betting:No
    Horse race betting:Online betting allowed
    Online poker:Social sites only; UIGEA still in effect
    Online casino games:Social sites only; UIGEA still in effect
    Minimum gambling age:18 (21 at some casinos)


    California Assemblymember Reginald Byron Jones-Sawyer introduced AB 1677 in February 2017. The goal of the bill was to legalize and regulate online poker in California. No wording in the bill even addressed the operator suitability issue. It looked like an attempt to start over.

    Two months later, with no real movement on the bill, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians withdrew from its alliance with PokerStars.

    California legislators never even got around to discussing online poker and when last day for the State Senate or Assembly to pass bills came on Sept. 15, California online poker was dead again.


    In 2016, California came closer to passing legislation that would legalize and regulate online poker than it ever has before. Yet still, by the time the state’s legislative session ended in August, no bill had passed.

    As it had been in the past, the biggest stumbling block for online poker legislation in the state in 2016 was operator suitability.

    A tribal coalition led by Pechanga and Agua Caliente was pushing for a 10-year ban against PokerStars and parent company Amaya. PokerStars itself, alongside in-state partners like the Morongo and San Manuel tribes and Commerce, Bicycle and Hawaiian Gardens cardrooms, wanted regulators to make the decision, but appeared willing to accept a five-year penalty or $20 million payment in lieu of it.

    In June, an online poker bill passed through the State Assembly’s Appropriations Committee. It was the furthest an online poker bill had ever gone in California. Then-Assemblyman Adam Gray, author of the bill, introduced amendments supporting a five-year ban for persons that took bets in California after Dec. 31, 2006. Depending on how the language in the amendments was interpreted, it may have also included a lifetime ban for operators that did the same.

    Neither side seems happy with it. PokerStars went from calling the tribal coalition obstructionists, to standing in the way of the online poker bill itself.

    The bill never made it through Assembly, Senate, or came anywhere close to making it to the Governor’s desk.

    The year 2016 started with the Horse Racing industry, Tribal casinos, and online poker operators all on different sides of the online poker issue in California. It ended much the same way.


    In many ways, 2015 is similar to the story of 2014, with the notable difference that political attention to the issue of online poker began earlier in the year and appears to have greater force behind it.

    There are currently two primary competing visions for online poker in California – AB 9 and AB 167 – both of which sit with the Governmental Organization Committee in the Assembly.

    There is an additional legislative vehicle for online poker in the Assembly: AB 431, sponsored by Assemblyman Adam Gray and co-authored by State Sen. Isadore Hall. AB 431 is currently a “shell” bill, meaning it contains little in the way of actual details or language.

    You can read more about and track each bill using California’s online legislative information system.

    As in past years, the key divisions revolve around who is eligible for licensure as an online poker operator.


    In February 2014, two online poker bills were announced.  SB 1366 would allow online poker only.  It included a bad actor clause that would forbid any company from operating in the state if it took action from U.S. players after December 31, 2006.

    AB 2291 was a similar bill.  One difference is that the bad actor clause was left open for future debate.

    On April 23, 2014, the California Assembly Committee on Governmental Organization held a hearing to discuss online poker.  Topics included the history of online poker in the U.S., testimony from executives involved in the regulated industry, as well as views from tribal and commercial gaming companies.

    The hearing appeared to be a positive for the online poker industry.  One opponent of gambling in general was cut off from his speech.  Andy Abboud, VP of Government Affairs for Las Vegas Sands, had his company’s motives questioned by the committee.  All members of the committee that spoke appeared to be educated about the online poker industry.

    Prior to 2014

    Online poker has been an issue in California for nearly a decade at this point. The state has seen numerous bills prior to the handful currently circulating in Sacramento.

    Six bills in the past had been introduced but failed to pass in the California Legislature.  Those bills were the Internet Poker Consumer Protection Act of 2013, SB 51, SB 678, SB 1463, SB 40 and SB 45. These bills would have legalized, regulated and taxed online poker in California.

    Is online poker legal in California? Read more about that complex question in this feature article.